Protecting literary freedom
Literary freedom needs to be
protected especially in democratic countries. In recent times, there has been several
attempts to get books withdrawn, pulped or sanitised of offending content. The
victims were Wendy Doniger’s The Hindus: An Alternative History, A.K.
Ramanujan’s essay ‘Three Hundred Ramayanas’, and Tamil writer Perumal Murugan’s
Madhorubagan (One Part Woman).
Shashi Tharoor, Congress MP and
writer, has introduced a private member’s Bill in the Lok Sabha seeking to
protect freedom of literature. As per the Bill, the authors must be guaranteed
the freedom to express their work without fear of punitive action by the State
or by sections of society.
Section 295A is a grossly misused
section, often invoked in trivial ways to hound individuals, harass writers and
curtail free expression. It deserves to be scrapped. Section 153A
punishes those who promote enmity
between groups on grounds of religion, race or language. Section 153B criminalises
words and imputations prejudicial to national integration. Considering all
these things, Tharoor’s initiative is most welcome.
Salman Rushdie's novel was banned. Tasleema
was forced out of India. Congress was party to it. Tasleema was hounded by
India's "secularist" stalwarts in West Bengal. The physical violence
Tasleema had to undergo in Hyderabad was something that needed to be condemned.
Freedom of expression should not be
misinterpreted as irresponsible way of writing gives vent to feelings and
impulses without contemplation like spontaneous overflow of emotions which
would find justification as," I write for myself and for nobody
else".
A man with clear vision in
political life and a miscalculated way in personal life is clearly indicated
the best approach to maintain the literary freedom in public life. The
religious enmity way should be scrapped at any cost. But in reality, the
irreligious sentiment is motivated in all walks of our life.
The literary freedom has been put
to pressure on the ground that free write ups in that sphere disturbs religious
harmony or hurts the feeling of a group and the like. Hence Tharoor’s
individual bill which invoke such freedom is welcome. At the same time the
writer must avoid intentional write up causing the boilings of group or
individual and disturbs harmony.
No comments:
Post a Comment