The absence of
a gold medal does make an Indian sad. For a country with an annual sports
budget of just over Rs 721 crore, where bureaucrats and sports administrators
test the endurance of athletes even before they qualify for the Olympics, the
London show is undoubtedly encouraging.
The Indian
medal winners - Gagan Narang, Vijay Kumar, Saina Nehwal, Mary Kom, Yogeshwar
Dutt and Sushil Kumar - deserve all the accolades, including substantial cash
awards.
We were
expecting a better performance from our boxers and archers. But they let us
down.
As far as
hockey is concerned, we scored an all-time low. This is a matter of shame. We
now need to prepare a blueprint for the grassroots-level development of the
game.
China had to
make room at the top for the United States which had a gold count of 46, ten
more than in Beijing .
China ’s gold collection came
down from 51 to 38 while Britain
earned 29 gold medals in a total of 65.
For athletes
to do well in international sporting events a lot of support from the
politicians and bureaucrats who control affairs at the state and national
levels is needed. India
would do well to study the China
model.
It is high
time different sports authorities in India spent more money in
infrastructures and boosted the young talent in every field of sports.
We should stop bragging about the history of
Indians in Olympics especially in sports like hockey. Every country is adopting
new techniques and style in every sport. London Olympics already witnessed some
of the magnificent performance from the countries like Bahamas who won gold in
4x400 relay race by destroying the dominance of American in this format and
Uganda who won gold after 40 years in 50 km marathon race, to show world that
nothing remains same forever. Indians should derive inspiration from these
countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment