Two opinions
about education
The government
should work primarily on quality of education, which is deteriorating day by
day. It can only be made possible when norms which are made by the government
body are followed strictly. The problem of brain drain should be tackled.
There is one
section of people who believe this: “Institutes which are meant merely for
profiteering must be closed with immediate effect. Because of such institution,
a demarcation is being created among students. Thirdly infrastructure is also a
concern for quality of higher education. If we are focusing on higher education
it should be inclusive of all classes of society; then only we can say we are
building a strong and healthy system of education. Lastly, a healthy management
is also required to improve higher education system. It’s sad to see that
"Education" which drives the growth and economy of a country is in
such sad state of affairs. Ideally the committees are meant to accelerate and
improvise decisions; however, nowadays it’s not an exaggeration to say they are
the source for delays. It’s unfortunate that the famed education in India
is now just a mere Money Making tool. We have this anathema to commercialize
education. Even now it is for profit practically. It is really disgusting and
pathetic. Diluting standards of higher education causes educational migrations
to overseas universities.
So the
government should take stringent actions to improve the quality of higher
education.”
The same
section of people complain: “Education is becoming business day by day.
Specially, in engineering colleges there is no quality in studies. After giving
the permission to the colleges, the government should check quality of the
college, especially lecturers. Nowadays people think that engineering college
lecturer is someone who doesn't get any job and so he joins as a lecturer. Also
many colleges don't have a proper lab facilities and engineering and medicine
and pharmacy colleges take deposits and semester examination fees and lacks of
donations.”
The above
points are those made by one section of people. But there are supporters of
commercialized education. They say: “Running an Educational Institution is an
economic activity. It involves men, money and material like any other business
activity. It involves balance sheet, capital expenditures and current
expenditures. How can this activity be performed without profit motivation if
it is to be done by private entities. Running the show is as complex as
construction industry. Yet no one says 'construction industry' should be a 'not
for profit' industry. An individual should not expect Socialistic expenditure
pattern on one side of the scale and Capitalistic income pattern on the other
side. Get realistic.”
Now which
among the above two sections of the people is right?
No comments:
Post a Comment