Positive and
negative sides of NFSA
It is high time
Indian government seriously implemented the National Food Security Act (NFSA). The Centre has managed to get two
States, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, to agree to the implementation of the Act. The
State says it will implement the Act and also continue its universal public
distribution system (PDS) coverage.
One clear advantage
of joining the national food security system now is that the computerisation
and Aadhaar seeding process may result in the elimination of bogus cards and
beneficiaries.
A national food security law holds good for States with weak food
security systems.
We often hear
ration of substandard quality, ration reduced, ration sold elsewhere, ration
infected, ration abandoned etc. When are we going to attend to these complaints?
Quality food is very important. There is a lot to improve in the country's rationing.
Here NFSA can prove to be useful.
States and
centre have been at loggerheads even on important policy like food security.
Such people centric programmes should be accorded too priority and even if there
is disagreement on other matters, the welfare of people must not be effected.
To avoid to and
fro transport in terms of cost and loss suggested, give priority to rice or
wheat or minor millets by procuring locally and storing them locally. This will
bring down the cost and losses in transportation. The central government must
insist that the state governments implement in to-to the food security bill.
Rice and wheat are produced under chemical inputs and thus carry chemicals in
them [non-healthy foods] and minor millets are produced mainly under
non-chemical inputs and thus healthy food.
The negative
side of the NFSA is that it is a coercive method of the Centre to make a state
like Tamil Nadu to implement National Food Security Act. Tamil Nadu has already
been doing good to the poor people by giving rice without a price and is doing
further good for them by Amma canteens. Now the NFSA implementation creates
additional burden to assure rice as per the Act. Since the Government has
weeded out bogus cards by Aadar card linking, only bonafide beneficiaries will
get the benefit out of the existing system. Yet the State has to bear
additional cost on NFSA and State has to make fund correction for this
permanent commitment to the cause of people’s welfare.
Thus, one
should see both the positive and negative side of NFSA.
No comments:
Post a Comment