Effects of demonetisation
The RBI Annual Report disclosed the amount of demonetised currency that
returned to the system as on June 30. It's now official — 99 per cent of the
extinguished currency or ₹15.29 lakh crore out of ₹15.44 lakh crore has
returned to the banking system.
The Economic Survey (Volume II) 2016-17 says “the growth of taxpayers post-demonetisation
was significantly greater than in the previous year. The addition amounted to
about 5.4 lakh taxpayers or 1 per cent of all individual taxpayers in just a
few months. The addition to the reported taxable income (of these new payers)
was about ₹10,600 crore”. the RBI
points out “that currency demand appears to have attained a new normal
(currently around 87 per cent of the pre-demonetisation peak)”. With GST, tax
compliance can be expected to rise sharply,
The demonetisation pave the way for proper information of valuations in assessing
the impact of money and its value. But some are of the opinion that actually,
no Demonetization happened, it was "withdrawal from circulation" of
Rs1000 and Rs500 notes. Black or white, all genuine currency notes were allowed
to be deposited in banks. Need to declare source or accounting the deposits
were all part of normal procedure. Media and analysts are messing up diverse
issues. Economic Survey contributed to the chaotic confusion by telling stories
about possible huge "gain" from Demonetization using fictitious
figures not supported by data. In the process, RBI got a bad name.
NDA’s half-hearted attempt to corner black money, through its two amnesty
schemes, got tepid response from the tax evaders. The amount of income declared
under the first scheme and the second scheme were around Rs 65kcr and Rs 10kcr,
respectively. According to experts, the aggregate amount declared under the two
schemes is ‘tip of the iceberg’.
Multi-pronged action is necessary to tackle the vice of black money. As
for generation of fresh black money, it depends on how easy not to pay
income-tax and other taxes. Evasion of taxes is the principal reason, giving
rise to the generation of black money.
According to some businessmen, black money is necessary to bribe various government
officials, including law enforcement agencies and Purchase Managers of customers,
if the product is in the buyers’ market (per contra, Sales Mangers, if the product
is in the sellers’ market), and that a businessman worth his salt wouldn’t use ‘white
money’ for these purposes; also for the reason that ‘bribe’ is not a
tax-deductible expenditure. In other words, it is not possible to run business
in India, profitably, without bribing officials and for ensuring protection
from undesirable elements of our society, etc. India/Bharat is not at all
‘swatch’ in this regard.
The Centre should take care to ensure that the sudden rise in searches
and seizures since demonetisation does not turn into a witch-hunt. It is said that
prior to the search operations, the targeted tax evader would receive an
anonymous telephone call, warning him of the impending raid and giving him
ample time to shift the hidden wealth elsewhere, with the result that nothing
material would be detected and seized during the search operation. The
anonymous caller would collect his share later on, as mutually agreed.
Technology is available not only to central bankers but also the
counterfeiters. We need to issue new series of notes much, much faster. Every
five to seven years we should necessarily bring in new series of notes to be
ahead of the counterfeiters. If so, can we expect frequent demonetization(s)?
No comments:
Post a Comment