Monday, October 9, 2017

Dinesh Kamath's Editorial 'Should we have simultaneous elections?' that was published in Newsband


Should we have simultaneous elections?
There is a debate going on about simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies. The ruling Bhratiya Janata Party has always been a vocal proponent of the move and the Prime Minister is pushing it with characteristic vigour. It has also found favour from various Parliamentary panels and the Law Commission on obvious grounds of reduction of expenditure, curtailing imposition of the Model Code of Conduct, minimising disruption of normal public life and lessening pressure on crucial manpower deployed for prolonged periods in poll-bound States.
But by making this move, can fractured verdicts and unstable governments be avoided? Will holding simultaneous elections tilt the polls in favour of national issues and national parties?
Another important proposal is any no-confidence motion against a government ought to include a confidence motion in favour of an alternative government to be headed by a named individual. All these measures require political consensus. The BJP must strive to evolve a consensus.
One should not underestimate the intelligence of the voters. They can and will choose what is best and they are no dull wits to overlook some issues or be influenced only by national issues while voting for state assemblies.
Next we come to the mother of all reforms - speeches given by the candidates during elections should be two-way communications, and not one-way - the public just listens, and there are no questions asked. Politicians do not like questioning audience. Making promises should be banned. Instead, candidates should be compelled to reveal how they will fulfil their promises. Electioneering is a serious business, and not entertainment. Look at the USA - the public grills the candidates. Can this happen here? If a member of the audience asks inconvenient questions, he will get thrashed by supporters of the candidate.

Polls may be cumbersome or expensive but any attempt at reforms must be weighed against whether they strengthen or erode democratic rights. We have to take risk to strengthen our country towards development as a whole. For good democratic setup and administration we should do it.

No comments:

Post a Comment