Stop misuse of Atrocity Act
There is an urgent need for procedural safeguards to curb false
accusations work against the interest of protecting the oppressed from
discrimination and caste-based atrocities. The Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is being rampantly
misused to settle personal scores and harass adversaries. There is need for guidelines to prevent its misuse.
In an ideal system, as long as every charge is judicially scrutinised and
every investigation or prosecution is fair and honest, one need not worry about
misuse and its adverse effects. However, social realities are far from being
ideal.
This SC/ST Act is atrocious, unconstitutional widely misused for
blackmail - 90 % of the complaints are fake. Hard working employees are unable
to bear the constant fear of this act without bail. It is high time the law is repealed
or struck down by courts since it gravely affects fundamental rights of
citizens envisaged in the constitution.
The punishment for misuse of Anti-atrocities law should at least be equal
to the punishment for which an innocent person has been wrongly accused under
the provisions of Anti-atrocities law. This will help in curbing the misuse of
the Anti-atrocities law.
The law is mostly misused by educated SC/ST employees employed in Government
or Government owned enterprises and in some private companies too. The problem
is with all the laws which shifts the proof from accuser to the accused. In
these kind of laws the accused person is held guilty and the onus is on him to
prove that he is not guilty. This gives undue advantage to the accuser and he
goes scot-free even if it was proved that his complaint was malafide.
There were several thousands of misuses over past few decades, so finally
some more checks and balances are needed.
Those offices which do not employ many SC/ST employees has probably not
had any personal experience of misconduct by them. The SC/ST employees are the
biggest menace and nuisance for other community employees and supervisors.
Nobody can question them for any misconduct, ill behaviour, causing losses or
inconvenience, not punctual at work, etc. In many cases others will have to
complete the work of SC/ST employees as they would leave their seats any time
without informing anyone. The supervisors are really scared of the SC/ST
employees. The Supreme Court observation and directions to the government,
though belated, is a big relief for government and public sector other
community staff. If the Supreme Court had annulled the Act itself, it would
have been a blessing for other communities. The political parties for their
vote-share purposes pamper the SC/ST people at the cost of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment