Need for data protection laws
The information age opened up great opportunities. But unauthorised
leaks, hacking and other Cyber Crimes have rendered data bases vulnerable. Hence
there arose a need for data protection laws.
The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, 2016, considers
that data protection is comprehensive and exemptions limited. Some may prefer the American model in which
the norms are stringent for government departments processing personal
information, while private entities have to abide by the norms of giving notice
and receiving consent.
There is an urgent need of a good data protection framework. In India Section 43A of the Information Technology
Act provides a measure of legal protection of personal information. In 2012, the Justice A.P. Shah Committee
recommended a set of principles for a legal framework for protecting privacy.
The Srikrishna Committee has also
flagged seven major principles.
But these laws require careful drafting and strictly defined concepts. It is legitimate to collect personal data
in the public interest, but this information should be protected and used only
for the purposes it was collected. Public
consent on the use of data has not been taken into account. The legal framework
should limit use of data by any agency and government must assure public that
their privacy will not be infringed.
Undeniably Personal Data has to be protected and has to be used for the
intended purposes either by governments or Private firms. Proliferating social
networking sites which had huge users base will reveal the fact that there is
more information in hands of private rather than governments. Without
appropriate technology that ensures transparency regarding usage no law can
ensure protection and no authority can adjudicate the law.
It is very serious matter to be discussed at length and depth; as there
are crooks inside and outside. Heads would spin if one views the dangerous
consequences if misused. Personal data in the hands of govt., should not end up
becoming a tool to bully the person it belongs (in case of irregular handling
and leakage).
Let there be any model. Unless the prevailing law is tightened to fix
time-bound accountability on those who committed data theft, leakage and breach
of confidentiality of private citizens’ personal information and their
financial data, damage that would flow from any slackness, is calculable.
A cursory glance into the thin statics of crime record in the National
Crime Records Bureau relating to stealing, tampering and breaking
confidentiality of data collected, processed and distributed, naturally raises
doubts that unreported data must be far exceeding the reported data. When the
government itself thought that right to privacy is not such a dignified thing
warranting consideration as a Fundamental Right and vociferously argued so before
the Supreme Court, the degree of importance of data protection would receive,
is understandable.
No comments:
Post a Comment