Will autonomy
ever be granted to the CBI?
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said it
would not be appropriate for a police agency to sit in judgment over policy
formulation without any evidence of mala fides. Union Finance Minister P.
Chidambaram taking the cue from him cautioned the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) and other authorities like the Comptroller and
Auditor-General against “overstepping their limits”. The government is clearly
uneasy with recent developments: the CBI wishes to be seen as being independent
and wants to scrutinise decisions such as those relating to allocation of coal
blocks, and there is greater public and judicial support for granting it
functional autonomy.
The issue of granting autonomy to the
CBI is being discussed in great details. According to some politicians, errors of
judgment during decision-making should not be misconstrued by an investigating
officer as crimes. Experience shows
that corrupt deals do take place in the garb of overtly proper administrative
decisions, while policies and norms ostensibly serving the public interest are
on many occasions framed in such a way as to suit vested interests.
In a Democracy, all the institutions
created by the Constitution as well as Legislature are subject to
accountability and checks and balances. The Institutions like the Legislature,
political executive, Judiciary have constitutionally well defined roles to play
and each one is independent of the other; the problem arises only when one
tries to step into the domain of the other.
All the talk of granting autonomy to the
CBI is hog wash and on the contrary everything done and spoken is to see that
the investigating agency functions as the hand maiden of the ruling class is
beyond doubt and the latest sermons from the government side is nothing but
efforts to clip the wings of the CBI and make it ineffective and to protect the
accused selectively according to needs of the times.
Only an independent investigating
agency, competent and capable of discharging its duties as per the Constitution
to the citizens, without fear of intimidation by Government/big
business/politicians or favour to the accused, can establish whether there were
genuine "errors of judgment during decision-making" or in fact abuse
of power and crimes were committed.
Desire for truth is the essence of good
faith. Good faith consists of the psychological fact (and preferably evidence)
of making one’s actions and words consistent with ones inner understanding and
beliefs: notions
of sincerity, truthfulness, honesty,
veracity, authenticity are all part of it. Lying assumes one knows/believes the
truth but deliberately does/says otherwise. A free man always acts honestly,
not deceptively. It is an unconditional duty. Tell the truth, unless e.g. to
save a life, is the norm.
No politician worth his salt will allow
any investigative agency to have parallel authority. Under the current regime
we are in for a long fight before CBI is defeated with transfers, promotions
and judicial enquiries which will break the back of any honest officer who
wants to serve the Country - not the regime.
No comments:
Post a Comment