Do things without violating
the laws
Young Christine
Mehta who was researching human rights for Amnesty International (India) in
Kashmir was deported by the Indian government in November 2014. Ms. Mehta joins
a list that includes film-makers and journalists. This proves that the
government of this largest democratic country wants no news other than what it
endorses. It was Amnesty that
campaigned for the freedom of some of the stalwarts of the anti-Emergency
movement who are now with the Bharatiya Janata Party. It is the same
organisation that deported Mehta.
The truth is that no
Government is perfect. There are million things that need to be improved. A
government elected to govern a country has to work within the parameters of the
existing laws. We may like the laws or we may have a contrary view. But as long
as we are within the geographical area governed by the laws we need to obey it,
like it or not. If we have an opinion - contrary to the law, we may petition
the government to change it. We can invite all persons involved in Legislature
to promulgate New Laws, review & amend existing laws - but at no stage
should incite undue negative opinion against the officials for implementing the
laws.
Our liberal
thinkers should review their ideas before expressing. In the present case Ms
Mehta is portrayed as well-informed about the laws of India but deliberately
continued to violate it for two long years. She wrote a sob-story in this
paper. Would she dare to do it in New York ?
The Amnesty
International India criticises India and has observed that it has neglected
international obligations and its own constitution by ignoring human rights
violations allegedly carried out in the name of national security in Jammu and
Kashmir state. The London-based rights group is based on the examination of
nearly 100 cases of alleged human rights abuses by security forces between 1990
and 2012 and interviews with 58 family members of the victims in 2013. Amnesty
International just applies western norms to developing countries, without
realizing the constraints and ground reality. Thanks to Indian army, Kashmir
has not become as violent as neighboring Pakistan & Afghanistan. The human
rights violations in Kashmir are no more than in other states of India and much
less than in Pakistan. Kashmir is ruled by democratically elected government
which depends on army's help to counter fanatic terrorists.
It is easier said
than done in dealing with human rights violations in India or for that matter
all over the world. The universal declaration on Human Rights has just remained
on paper without any legal remedy or actions against the perpetrators. Why should
India alone re-set its tolerance levels when the whole world behaves like a
silent spectator to so many violations?
But if you look
from another angle, one wonders as to why the NDA is getting so intimidated and
defensive. Human rights violation needs to be curbed and the only way out is by
acknowledging that it exists. This is the problem with third world countries,
be it Sri Lanka or Pakistan or India. We commit excesses and expect the World
to watch and keep quiet about.
No comments:
Post a Comment