Check the drugs
before they’re sold in the market
The Delhi High
Court verdict quashed all notifications banning the manufacture and sale of 344
Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) drugs. The government wanted the ban on
combination drugs that have little therapeutic value. However, the government could not convince the court that the ban was
valid.
Yes, some
combinations are unsafe and/or promote antibiotic resistance, while others lack
particular therapeutic value, justification or advantage. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw chose
to subject to scrutiny the process by which the decision was arrived at. He found that the government went about the
process in a haphazard manner. The Kokate Committee was formed and based on its
report, the Centre issued notifications banning these FDCs. The court objected to government having
sought advice from a non-statutory committee instead of expert bodies
The government
must have seen the ground realities. Many drugs comes as a relief for cough and
cold, but it either stops the cold or the cough or neither but never both. This
is a very common problem especially for paediatric drugs. Combination drugs are
effective if the blood pressure of the individual is constant throughout with
minimal variations. For individuals with nominally varying blood pressure,
combination drugs are least effective and sometimes counter productive
By considering
technicality alone as a reason to lift the ban on the FDC is not encourageable.
It should consider all the reasons and take the advices from statutory bodies
like Drug Technical Advisory Board (DTAB) and Drug Consultative Committee (DCC).
That would be good for health and lives of the people of the country.
There are many
drugs sold in the market which are harmful and not adviced by eminent
professional doctors. The pharmaceutical companies are manufacturing mist drugs
to profit rather than protect the health of the people. The government must
prove the companies intentions and check the utility of drugs sold in the
market.
In a matter
involving the health and lives of the people of the country, the HC may be
wrong by going by the mere technicality in quashing the order. It is simply
unfortunate that technical consideration should prevail over the real core
issue. Probably the courts should have considered the core issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment