Tell
people the entire truth
On August 28, the Centre had issued a statement
on a mutual decision for Indian and Chinese troops to disengage and withdraw
from the part of the Doklam plateau disputed between China and Bhutan that had
been the scene of the stand-off. However, last week the Army chief, General
Bipin Rawat, said Chinese troops are in parts of Doklam they had hitherto not
manned. Such divergence in public statements also fuels speculation that
something deeper and more troubling exists on the ground.
Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar put China’s
rise first on a list of “major disruptors” in the region. General Rawat said
that the “time has come” for India to “shift focus” from its western border
with Pakistan to its northern border with China. Beijing’s
latest belligerent statements that all of Doklam belongs to China and is under
its “effective jurisdiction” could be indicators that the agreement announced
in August is unravelling.
When diplomacy is undesirably used to hide
intentions and facts, India will increasingly face credibility gap in its
internal and external behaviors. As reports are emerging of Chinese activities
in the sensitive Doklam Plateau the Centre has to thread with caution. Allowing
the Chinese to establish over the Doklam Plateau they will put the Indian army
out of the way and then dominate the heights over the river valley and will be
able to go further west and cut off the roads that are used for supplies to
Nathu-La in Sikkim. This will leave the Chinese free to attack down south
towards the Siliguri corridor or the chicken's neck in West Bengal where they
could theoretically cut off North Eastern states from the rest of India.
Another reason why India has to be cautious with China is the way the Chinese
aggression had taken place in 1962 when India never expected the Chinese army
of 80000 to invade and fight and army of 10000 to 15000 Indian soldiers. It was
a complete victory for China with substantial casualties on the Indian forces
and taking over Aksai Chin now in Chinese possession originally a part of India
China should mend its ways of looking over the
issue, as the part belongs to the Indian side since times immemorial. As far as
India is concerned, it seems a classic case of chest-thumping (mainly for electoral
considerations, doing no benefit to national interest) coming back to bite. All
parties, forgetting the history of accusations, should evolve some basic
consensus on issues where national interest is so important that political
considerations must be avoided at all costs. It will be unfortunate if the government
isn't having space to do the right thing in matters of national security,
International relations due to a monster created by themselves.
It is sensitive time for India. It is time to
keep the stringent eyes on both northern and western border. Because both are
in fear. Western border is facing the huge casualty whereas northern is facing
the ambiguity between three countries.
The whole episode should be disclosed publicly
so that people can understand the actual position.
No comments:
Post a Comment