Proof is important
The arrest of five prominent
activists by the Pune police
has disturbed the law abiding people.
The case for proceeding against them
will be properly scrutinised. The focus will now be on the next hearing of the
Supreme Court.
Is this yet another clumsy failure
to distinguish between those who indulge in or actively support violent
activity, and those who attempt to understand or empathise with the social
conditions that breed extremism and insurgency? The activists are accused of
doing much more than inciting the violence that broke out in Bhima-Koregaon,
near Pune, this year. They allegedly made provocative speeches at a Dalit
conference relating to the 200th anniversary of an iconic battle site
Human rights activists,
particularly those working in conflict-prone areas, have been harassed and even
arrested on the suspicion of being in league with extremists. The bald truth is
that successful prosecutions are rare. Charges such as sedition, waging war
against the government and promoting disaffection against the state rarely end
in conviction.
The Pune police claim that the five
who have now been arrested were raising funds for the Maoists, and indulging in
unlawful activities; that they had a nexus with other unlawful groups and,
ominously, were plotting to “target high political functionaries”. Now the
burden of proof on the police is extremely high.
The liberal/secular media is
clearly batting for the "activists" and vilifying the government. These
people take advantage of the rights and liberties enshrined in our Constitution
and misuse them to further their own agenda. Police should be given a chance to
prove its case before condemning it of high- handedness. Finally the judiciary
has woken up and not allowed police to carry highhanded arrests in clear
disregard to process and rights of citizens. It is time that police reforms are
implemented fully.
The persons who were involved in
arrests are just tools of the rulers. They need not prove anything. The powers
that be should prove that they are not muzzling dissent and debate. Targeting
dissent, as you aver, is an inexcusable and fundamental flaw in a democracy.
Empathy and compassion are essential components of a civil society for its
progress, prosperity and progressiveness.
That dissent is the bedrock of
democracy may be a clichéd axiom. But its verity and relevance never recede.
However, the apex court intervention in favor of the five activists signals
that everything is not lost in the nation.
Sir appcoor ho
ReplyDelete