Monday, September 14, 2015
Saturday, September 12, 2015
Dinesh Kamath's Editorial 'Improve air quality' that was published in Newsband
Improve air quality
Indian government
should do something drastic to improve air quality in our country. Dust, caused by a wide range of natural and
man-made activities, can have a deeply damaging impact on the respiratory
tract. But at the levels at which they are being experienced, gaseous
pollutants have equally detrimental effects. The government’s own website is clearly showing that a number of Indian
cities are experiencing what should be health emergencies on a daily basis.
Local governments
must clamp down on the specific pollutants that are pushing their respective
cities into the danger zone, whether it means moving polluting industries
outside city limits or curbing the number of private vehicles by making
available better public transport systems. They must also make it a habit to
monitor pollution levels more closely. The Union government, meanwhile, must
come out with an action plan for ‘severe’, ‘very poor’ and ‘poor’ air quality
regions.
In cognisance with
the spirit of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan it's essential for all of us to realize
that it is high time to change our lifestyle. Otherwise, the dire consequences
will not only harm us but our future generations as well. As an informed
citizenry, we should not be waiting for the state to take actions via their
policies and start working towards a greener and a cleaner country
We can fast track
the metro work and get it available to maximum public and also bring in some
electric autos for commuting from metro stations to people's places. The day
when metro and only metro will become the mode of the transportation for
general public the pollution will
come down. Metros can be a great way of connectivity. It can be run in the city
as well as places outside the city.
The rising level
of pollution in cities is largely proportional to government's policies of
transport as well on policing system. Even in metros we do not have proper
connectivity of public transports. Neither we have the transportation for late
hours nor do we have any security on the roads. So in the process of making a
safe and comfortable journey people of all ages and economy group are now using
their own vehicles. This not only creates traffic but also impose a heavy
health hazard. With the increasing number of commuters there is also an
increase in number of personal vehicles. Personal as well as public goods
vehicles together are making a great contribution in life threatening gasses in
environment.
The quality of air
that we breathe in the city and suburbs is largely controlled by the transports
on the road. There seem to be no regulation on the exhaust quality of these
vehicles. The buses that ply in the towns and villages are of the worst
quality. To the extent the state implemented the helmet rule, it should also
look into the exhaust quality of the public transport. The silence of
environmental activists is equally worrisome.
Clean air is very
much a part of our dream of Clean India. Monitoring of the air quality, national
index based on data collected and color coded indexes to create awareness are
steps towards recognizing the problem. However, what needs to be done is much
more. Steps towards reducing pollution at individual, family and community
levels have to be taken along with policy measures by government.
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Dinesh Kamath's Editorial 'Why death penalty should be abolished' that was published in Newsband
Why death penalty should be
abolished
According to the
Law Commission of India, the abolition of the death penalty must become a goal
for India. It wants the scrapping of
the death penalty for all crimes except terrorism-related offences and those
that amount to waging war against the state. It has sought a return to the notions of restorative and reformative
justice. Thus the Commission has put the ball in Parliament’s court.
Death penalty is
nothing but giving the guilty a very undeserved easy way out. Taking into
consideration the theory of reformative, the death penalty serves no purpose
rather than emancipating the perpetrator of the crime from all sufferings and
penance. For the crimes such as rape, corruption, murder, the convict must be
allowed to suffer in inhumane conditions for the certain period and must be
given a chance to reform himself and to remorse for the heinous crimes.
Miscarriage of
justice is one thing while abolition of death penalty is different perspective.
The recommendation by the LCI indicates sympathy towards less heinous crime.
Death penalty is
costly. It diverts resources from honest crime control measures. Crime fighting
resources can be used more efficiently. An innocent person should not go to
gallows due to the inadequacy of criminal justice system. Mistakes in the form
of inadequate legal representation, prosecutorial delinquency, shoddy police
investigations and misconduct, prejudice, and falsified evidence can contribute
to wrongful convictions.
International
Commission against death penalty has this to say:
1)
The
risk of executing innocent people exists in any justice system. There have been
and always will be cases of executions of innocent people. No matter how
developed a justice system is, it will always remain susceptible to human
failure. Unlike prison sentences, the death penalty is irreversible and
irreparable.
2)
The
arbitrary application of the death penalty can never be ruled out. The death
penalty is often used in a disproportional manner against the poor, minorities
and members of racial, ethnic, political and religious groups.
3)
The
death penalty is incompatible with human rights and human dignity. The death
penalty violates the right to life which happens to be the most basic of all
human rights. It also violates the right not to be subjected to torture and
other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. Furthermore, the
death penalty undermines human dignity which is inherent to every human being.
4)
The
death penalty does not deter crime effectively. The death penalty lacks the
deterrent effect which is commonly referred to by its advocates. As recently
stated by the General Assembly of the United Nations, “there is no conclusive
evidence of the deterrent value of the death penalty” (UNGA Resolution 65/206).
It is noteworthy that in many retentionist states, the effectiveness of the
death penalty in order to prevent crime is being seriously questioned by a
continuously increasing number of law enforcement professionals.
5)
Public
opinion is not a major stumbling block for abolition. Public support for the
death penalty does not necessarily mean that taking away the life of a human
being by the state is right. There are undisputed historical precedences where
gross human rights violations had had the support of a majority of the people,
but which were condemned vigorously later on. It is the job of leading figures
and politicians to underline the incompatibility of capital punishment with
human rights and human dignity.
It needs to be
pointed out that public support for the death penalty is inextricably linked to
the desire of the people to be free from crime. However, there exist more
effective ways to prevent crime.
Dinesh Kamath’s column ‘New movies released in Navi Mumbai’ (Hero, The Perfect Girl and We are your friend) that was published in Newsband
New movies released in Navi
Mumbai
By Dinesh Kamath
Hero
Hero is an Indian romantic action film directed by Nikhil
Advani and co-written by Umesh Bist, a remake of Subhash Ghai's directed 1983
film of the same name, which starred Jackie Shroff. The film marks the debut of
Sooraj Pancholi, son of Aditya Pancholi, and for Athiya Shetty, the daughter of
Sunil Shetty.
Sooraj (Sooraj Pancholi) is a gangster of Mumbai who
meets Radha (Athiya Shetty), daughter of the city's Chief of Police. One day,
Sooraj takes Radha, telling her that he got instructions from the police to
take her away from city for some time. Later Radha finds out she was kidnapped
by Sooraj. After a series of events, Sooraj leaves Radha. But by then, they
have fallen in love. Thereafter, comes the part where they have to face
problems.
To be more exact, the leading hero (Sooraj Pancholi) is a
best man of a popular goon who is arrested by the police. The goon asks the
hero to warn the Chief of Police Shrikanth Mathur (Tigmanshu Dhulia). Sooraj
not only warns Mathur, but also kidnaps his daughter Radha (Athiya Shetty). The
heroine falls for the hero who himself is a goon. However, he hides this fact, and
the two fall in love.
She then realizes the reality and asks him to surrender.
He surrenders after which he is imprisoned for two years, and returns as an
improved man. However, Radha’s family disapproves him. Meanwhile, Radha is
forced to marry another man Jimmy. This man initially appears good but later
people realize that he is a smuggler. On the other hand, the villain returns
from jail and kidnaps the Mathur family. However, the hero rescues them all,
giving us a happy ending.
The film has Sooraj Pancholi as Sooraj, Athiya Shetty as
Radha, Tigmanshu Dhulia, Kader Khan, Aditya Pancholi, Imran Hasnee, Sharad
Kelkar, Sakthivel and Salman Khan.
The music for Hero is composed by Amaal Mallik, Meet Bros
Anjjan and Sachin-Jigar while lyrics are by Kumaar and Niranjan Iyengar. The
film has songs like "Main Hoon Hero Tera (Salman Khan Version)", "Jab
We Met", "Main Hoon Hero Tera (Armaan Malik version)", "Khoya
Khoya", "Yadaan Teriyaan (Version 1)", "Yadaan Teriyaan
(Version 2)", "Dance Ke Legend" and "O Khuda".
The Perfect Girl
The Perfect Girl is a 2015 Hindi-language Indian feature
film written and directed by Prakash Nambiar. 'The Perfect Girl' is a film
written & directed by Prakash Nambiar, produced by Udit Shivraj Pathak
under the banner Creative Ocean Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. in association with
Kathaa Animations.
The film has an interesting plot. In the tourist town of
Goa, a young girl is waiting for a bus which has been delayed by an hour. A
young boy catches fancy of her and tries to spark of a conversation. Initially
cold to each other, both of them go for a little walk before the delayed bus
arrives. What happens when two strangers meet for just over an hour and realise
they are perfect for each other? What if life has other plans? Would you wait
for your destined perfect other, or would you move on?
The film has Teeshay, Tara Alisha Berry, Shishir Sharma, Sonali
Sachdev, Raju Kher, Smita Hai, Asha Sharma, Vikram Singh Chauhan and Vijay
Shetty.
We are your friends
We Are Your Friends is a 2015 American music drama film
directed by Max Joseph in his feature film directorial debut, and written by
Joseph and Meaghan Oppenheimer, from a story by Richard Silverman. The film
stars Zac Efron, Emily Ratajkowski, and Wes Bentley, and follows a young DJ
trying to make it in the music industry. Through the obstacles that he
encounters and with the influence of a charismatic music producer, the aspiring
DJ is ultimately guided onto the path that leads him to success.
The film has an interesting plot. Cole Carter (Zac
Efron), a struggling 23-year-old DJ in the electronic dance music (EDM) scene,
dreams of becoming a major record producer. When an older DJ, James (Wes
Bentley), becomes his mentor, Cole connects with James' girlfriend, Sophie
(Emily Ratajkowski). Cole's relationship with Sophie blossoms and breaks the
bond with his mentor, which forces Cole into difficult decisions about his
future.
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Dinesh Kamath's Editorial 'There is nothing wrong if BJP and RSS meet and talk' that was published in Newsband
There is nothing wrong if
BJP and RSS meet and talk
There was a samanvay
baithak, or coordination meeting, between the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh. Not just senior BJP leaders who were in attendance, Prime
Minister Narendra Modi and most of his ministerial colleagues from the BJP
lined up for the meeting. It became clear that BJP government feels it is accountable
to the secretive RSS. Many people criticized and spoke bitterly against this
kind of meeting taking place between RSS and BJP government. But the question
is: what is wrong with such kind of meeting?
The BJP is
organically tied to the RSS. There is nothing wrong if there is sense of
ownership that RSS sanghchalaks feel over this government. What should be
appreciated is that ever since BJP has come to power, not once has Modi spoken the
language of religious hatred and communal divisiveness, Modi was himself all
political correctness.
The egalitarian
ethos of our democratic edifice guarantees every one the right to debate,
dialogue and discuss. The elitist intellectual class never raised eyebrows when
the then PM Dr. Manmohan Singh presented accounts and reports of his government
and policies to his mentor and party supremo Mrs. Gandhi. It was seen as something
natural, a party leader who is also holding the mantle of central government to
discuss and seek advise from the Party President. What is then legitimately
wrong when the party in power discusses or debates its internal (Not official)
assessment of governance in its organization and seeks suggestions. In a
participative democracy, listening to all is never a problem; yielding to
unfair and unethical demands is! As long as the central govt. relentlessly
pursues its core agenda of development, national progress and rule of the land,
there should not be a prejudiced haste to add uncalled impetus to its
organisational meetings where it is free to discuss.
The fact of the
BJP rulers interacting with their parent organisation RSS is no secret and
known to all. The Press is at least able to take exception to it saying that
the "RSS is seeking to appropriate for itself the role of an
extra-constitutional super-parliament". Extra-constitutionalism as a
governing tool was introduced in the country only during Indira/Sanjai Gandhi
time and how it reached its zenith during UPA I and II is too well known. When
the kind of extra-constitutionalism that was being practised by UPA I and II is
compared, the Samanvay baithak of the BJP would pale into insignificance for
any unbiased observer.
This baithak is
only to take stock of how the ruling party is going about implementing party
programmes and whether any course correction is needed etc. It is not for
sharing official secrets with the Sangh or such unacceptable purposes. People
should not get into controversy regarding who consults whom. We want good
governance. The RSS is a national organization and mother of BJP. So, they
consult and obey their mother.
What about the
government led by Congress for 10 years? Who was their mother? The then PM was
accountable to a single person of foreign origin. I think, it is better to work
in collaboration with a national level organization than to work at the
instance of a single person. Are RSS people not the citizens of India? Every
government must share its achievements and future plans with the citizens. That
is what government has done. Everybody is a citizen first and member of any
organization afterwards. It is good that the present ruling party is overseen
and guided by a large organization compared to the previous government which
took directions from members of a family. So, let us think rationally, not
emotionally. Set aside your cherished prejudices and think in the national
interest.
Monday, September 7, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















