Saturday, February 13, 2016

Dinesh Kamath's Editorial 'Ban sex-selective abortions' that was published in Newsband

Ban sex-selective abortions
The twin strategy of tracking sex-determined foetuses and requiring institutional deliveries is expected to ensure that female babies are not aborted, or killed at birth. India has been persistently failing to address the problem of female foeticide but Maharashtra is believed to have come down severely on errant doctors and clinics, which is significant given the likely impact the State’s large population could have on child sex ratios. On a national average, the number of girls for every 1,000 boys in this segment of the population dipped to 918 in the 2011 decennial population Census. The corresponding figures were 927 and 933 in 1991 and 2001, respectively.
There are reasons why mindsets are not changing. It is actually linked to many practices our society is accustomed to. For example, gap between 'average age for getting married' for a man and for a woman is huge. While men are usually allowed to seek a job till 29-30, girls are married off much earlier. There is very less emphasis on a girl's financial independence. Another practice is related to sending off a girl 'compulsorily' to her in-laws house. Yet another practice is changing surnames. Some 'revered' traditions include symbols like mangalsutra and vermilion. These seem small things but are the things that actually matter.
It is a fallacy in the Male dominated Indian mindset that Male child are preferred to a Girl child. Would these people who resort to aborting female children prefer a foolish idiotic and a moron boy with no intelligence compared to a Girl child who can turn out to be brilliant and excel not only in academics, sports or any field of activity. In fact there are several instances in families that the Girls have outshone Boys in their chosen field of activity. In India it is myth that boys carry their lineage. But what lineage are they talking about if he becomes useless and proves to be a burden to his parents and society.
Another thing is that in India, the vast majority of deliveries take place in homes in the vast rural area where even the basic health facilities like maternity homes are absent not to talk of the facility for sonography test required to determine the sex of the foetus. This problem should also be addressed.
The issue relating to killing female foetus is a social problem, but it can be fixed by recourse to law and order methods, provided these were made to work. South Korea witnessed a similar problem a few years ago, and then all of a sudden, the government came down with full force, stripping famous doctors of their licenses and throwing them in jail for years, creating an example. But in India, none of these things would work. Doctors would not be named or identified, and even if they were to, they would not be prosecuted, and if they were, they would not be convicted. And people, especially in the Northern plains will go on with this inhuman practice.
Now female infanticide has reduced, though not drastically, but present thought of legalizing sex determination, most probably will increase the infanticide rate, as abortion is not a crime in India, as in Iran and other gulf countries. Sex ratio is widening with fewer females for males, and that requires strict implementation of PCPNDT Act, along with strengthening women empowerment schemes and criminalizing various cultural discrimination against women, being the reason for male child obsession in Indian families.

Preference for a male child is so rampant in our country that sex determination test has become a huge business for doctors who are unconcerned about ethic and wish to make money. Therefore, if freedom is given to conduct sex determination test or such test is made compulsory for all pregnant women, it will be very difficult to punish those who misuse the test to kill the female foetus.

No comments:

Post a Comment