New beginning in Executive-Judiciary relationship
Only cooperation between
the executive and the judiciary can enable one to
tackle high number of pending cases in the country. Prime Minister Narendra Modi
has assured to the Chief Justice of India, J.S. Khehar, that his government
would contribute its share in reducing the judiciary’s burden. Modi gave the
assurance after observing the pain behind the words of Justice Khehar over the
increasing backlog of cases. It will
surely represent a new beginning in the executive-judiciary relationship.
Modi also spoke of the
use of technology and digitalisation in the judicial system. But paying lip
service is one thing and doing what is needed to be done to make Judiciary efficient is
another. No Democratic country can
progress in case its judicial and executive system are at loggerheads. The
issue of judicial appointment needs to be settled quickly and vacancy should be
filled without any delay so that the common citizen gets justice, it will also
help in restoring the faith of common people in judiciary.
A justiceful life is also
a basic need or basic right of everyone. So, it is necessary for each country
to provide a better judicial system to their citizens. Both the Prime minster
and chief justice are 100% right. We are really
outnumbered in term of judges in India and there are many cases pending since a
long time.
Government is the biggest
litigant in courts. Being so, it is expected to act as a "model
litigant". This encompasses refraining from unwarranted litigation, and
taking up litigation only after thorough filtering of the matter. Strict
adherence to litigation policies, both national and state is very much needed.
Even if this much is seriously implemented by the government, it will greatly
contribute in unburdening the courts.
It would definitely be
great for this democracy if the standoff between the two most powerful organs
of the state who have always locked horns with each other since independence
gets resolved and mere assurances by the executive neither solves the problem
of pending cases nor the problem of pending vacancies. It’s now upon the
executive to expedite the process and make sure that it does not jeopardize an
equally powerful organ of the state which has gained a very respectful position
all round the world for its ability to uphold the rule of law in our country.
PM’s assurance that his
Government would contribute its share in reducing the pending cases in the
higher & lower judiciary is welcome. Vacancy in judiciary may be cited as
main reason for huge arrears of cases in the courts. But most of the cases get
struck because of the attitude of Lawyers and judges as they do not feel the
pinch of the litigants since they lack judiciary digitaliasation and simplicity
in procedure. Long hours of working like other professionals will help
judiciary.
Recognising the problem
of pendency of cases is a positive step. But, certain important decisions must
be taken for speedy justice. Number of judges must be increased along with more
number of courts in different cities. Also, time frame should be worked out
depending upon civil and criminal cases and the disposal necessity.
Appointing sufficient
number of judges is a very important component of the solution. Does it
suffice? Any case involves the litigants, the legal fraternity both official
and unofficial, the witnesses ranging from the eye witnesses to experts, the
infrastructure, including equipments and proficient personnel to man them and
various other factors, are to be taken into consideration. Whatever is said and
done it is not possible to control human avarice. This bug can affect all
around including litigants and their advocates. The system of payment to the
legal fraternity has to be looked into afresh. Undue postponements to suit the
lawyers, not litigants, and calling for postponements and desire for more and more
dates are some of the issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment