Saturday, August 8, 2015

Dinesh Kamath's Editorial 'Indiscriminate liquor consumption is bad' that was published in Newsband

Indiscriminate liquor consumption is bad
It is necessary to bring about prohibition of intoxicating drinks and drugs except those for medicinal purposes. While many women’s groups support prohibition, the political will to crack down on illicit liquor is weak just because the government believes that any ban on liquor sales will necessarily have to co-exist with a spurt in bootlegging and illicit distillation.
In India prohibition has led to loss of lives in hooch tragedies. Now people arguing for prohibition must realize that they are arguing from a purely moral standpoint. They want to ban alcohol because they think it is bad. The fact is that alcohol consumption is a personal choice and there is nothing with it so long as it is not done to excess.
The liquor business is both good and bad. Firstly it is good as it generates huge income for Government as well as the middle men with less effort. The profits are high when compared to any other trade. But it’s bad due to its ill effects on human body if taken without control.
Total prohibition of liquor is not a solution of our country. If government bans any type of intoxicant things then its seller chooses another way to sell this kind of things, resulting in bootlegging. To prevent liquor consumption, the best thing to do is create awareness about ill-effect of liquor and other drugs. Today, people booze not much because of pleasure and enjoyment but because of monetary and family tensions. It is an escape route for daily problems and then turns into a habit-formation. For people engaged in physical work, in today's high cost of living, the need to work beyond their physical capacity becomes imperative. The intake of insufficient diet is supplemented by boozing, in a hope to go to sleep on empty stomach. The medical fraternity can instead guide people to go in for supplementary B-complex, multi-vitamin tablets and the Government should make it available cheaper. It should help people to keep away from liquor.
Worldwide experience is against total ban on alcohol. While consuming alcohol focus should be on quality control, consumption control, and healthcare. Perhaps an old system of individually bought permits, hours of pub/bar operation, and sellers' liability in crime committed under the influence of alcohol will help. However, hotels, bars, night clubs, and heavy drinkers will fight alcohol controls. Women and children are country's best bet on controlling alcohol abuse. It takes at least a generation to change attitudes to smoking and aclohol abuse.
From time immemorial human beings have exhorted to consumption of alcohol and other substances in order to extricate themselves from boredom, anxiety, stress, sickness, and more often to indulge in pleasures of the body and exotic sexual perversion. Numerous organisations have undertaken research on the disastrous effects of alcohol among the youth of today's modern society. The studies reveal a trend towards a form of decadence and social consequences that far outweigh any political or monetary gain for any government. It is an absolute moral obligation that society and government protect its members from substances that will corrode the fabric of community development and progress through encouraging liquor consumption. Western society is battling this evil that has only caused family violence and degradation of values.

It is very clear that the common people have no will power not to drink liquor. The liquor is not sold free of cost. If the people have will power not to drink liquor, then there will be no taker for the liquor and ultimately it will lead to closure of liquor shops.

No comments:

Post a Comment