Government
should spare the common man
The Bharatiya Janata
Party-led government has decided to act boldly and slash interest rates on
several Centrally sponsored savings schemes. The decision will upset senior
citizens, and the salaried middle class that forced the government to
reconsider its decision to tax a portion of the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF)
corpus upon withdrawal. And though the government
finally abandoned the Budget 2016 proposal to tax EPF, it was a clear indicator
of things to come.
The rate cut
covers a broad spectrum of schemes, including the Public Provident Fund (PPF),
the Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) and the National Savings Certificates (NSC). Senior Citizens, who are not covered under any pension scheme, have to
depend on the interest from these Small Saving Schemes for their day to day
living. Government can at least consider exempting Senior Citizens from these
rate cuts.
India needs a
welfare state not elite state. The economists of the government must understand
the real areas of loss of the government funds and should not attack the small
purses of the common people. The sociology of common people needs to be taken
care of. High level analyses are of no use at the ground level where common
people operate.
The recent
changes in the economic policies is having a direct adverse impact on the day
to day life of the middle class. Their purchasing power is declining every year
due to increase in cost of lower as well as higher education and other
necessities of life. Hence the demand for consumer products are declining and
they are compelled to over extend themselves by going in for consumer and
higher educational loans under EMS or otherwise. Similarly SCS without any
social security coverage are compelled to invest in SS Schemes to protect the
principal amount and for regular receipt of interest income without any risk. They
will be put to hardship in meeting their monthly commitments including ever
increasing medical expenses. Let it be taxation - direct or indirect - or
reduction in interest rates on deposits it is the middle class that is being
hit. It seems the present day policies are directed against the welfare of the
so called middle and lower middle class. It needs a change.
The recent SBI
research report suggestion to consider differential (higher) rates for savings
in the accounts of elders and in age-groups above 45 years is worth looking at.
Another group which may deserve differential treatment may be those who are not
investing in these instruments for income tax benefit. A related issue is
professionalism in management of funds flowing into governments’ kitty which
now come from captive sources like LIC, EPFO, banks (SLR deposits), National
Savings Schemes and PPF. As these funds are used by government and no
investment risk prevalent in money with the banking system is to be factored
in, it is natural that savers expect a higher rate of return on investment in
such financial instruments. Any thought of relating interest rates on
investments in such instruments with bank interests is unacceptable.
No comments:
Post a Comment