PM is clean, declares EC
Senior Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa has given dissenting opinions
regarding four of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speeches and one of BJP
national president Amit Shah. The full Commission did not find any violation of
the Model Code of Conduct in the speeches by a majority of 2:1.
The Commission has so far cleared six speeches of Modi, apart from his
interview to a TV news channel in Varanasi on April 26, observing that they did
not violate the code and its advisories. This is the second instance after the
rafale expose', that there is an internal dissent while taking a government
decision. In the light of this development, the CAG report on rafale should
also be probed for internal dissent.
Jurisprudence is not the expression of a consensus, but a system that is
rooted in upholding the law. If the Election Commission can do no better than
to come to a diplomatic consensus to deal with a charge of violation of EC
regulations, then they might as well assign themselves to the category of
emasculated, nail-less and toothless agents of the ruling party.
Just as film censorship has undergone changes in expectations of what is
ok and what is not, the model code of conduct has also undergone change. On one side we have sophisticated crooks who
try to repeat the lie again and again misguiding the public, on the other side
there is a crude set of politicians who dont mind speaking their mind out
without hiding any ill feelings.
Election Commission of the day has to decide what is ok to take the
election to a business end.
The clean chit to PM comes with 'dissent'. Seventy-one of the retired IAS
guys suddenly got a stroke of 'morality' and objects to a candidate put up by a
party as an immoral act. The chief Justice of India gets accused of 'sexual misconduct' by a
sacked female worker and a totally
'committed' senior lawyer takes up cudgels on her behalf and faults the CJI for
sitting in on that issue. The cycle goes on but the funny part of all this
drama is that while high corruption and total ineptness was ruling the roost prior
to 2014, nobody had either the time or the courage to voice an opinion. While
the educated/informed were playing blind, the poor dumb millions were mere
spectators. Hence, from a dispassionate view, it looks as if there is a method
in this madness, a sly and rather convoluted attempt to influence the ongoing
elections instead of fighting it on general principles of economy or national
welfare.
Corruption was rampant in the years prior to 2014. But is it less now?
Corruption among politicians comes to public attention when the investigating
agencies work on it. In the five years, federal agencies of all hue have
carried out investigations; all such raids were on properties belonging to the
members of the opposition parties. Does that mean that all the members of the
ruling dispensation are sons of Harish Chandra?
And more to the point, for all the 'investigations' during the five years
of the BJP rule how many have been taken to court for their corrupt activities
in the past. The whole thing appears to be a drama enacted to sensationalise
the issues; the rich and powerful go unscathed whether it is Ravana1 or Ravana2
who is in power.
No comments:
Post a Comment