Two ways of
tightening our national security
There was a
time when Indian government would voice concerns about American reluctance to
transfer technology. But now the significant paradigm shift has occurred within
the US administration on
technology transfers to India .
According to
US Commerce Department statistics, well over 99% of licence requests for dual
use technology were granted in fiscal year 2011 and the percentages were also
quite similar for munitions licences. Where Indian dissatisfaction arises is
when provisos, or conditions, are sometimes placed on certain systems which
deny the most sensitive components or technological know-how.
Technology is
a strategic, rather than a commercial commodity for the US and is not
parted with lightly. It will take more time to build US
confidence on transferring technology to India - but it will grow over the
long term as the relationship deepens.
However, no
amount of foreign tech transfer will ever make India self-reliant in defence
production. To become self-reliant India should foster more
competition for its Defence Public Sector Undertakings by allowing its own
private sector to compete in the defence market. Private companies should be
invited to compete against the public sector in making defence weapons like the
Army’s Tactical Communications System. Private companies are indeed eager to
contribute to Indian defence needs especially those companies who do have financial
incentive to build the necessary infrastructure for defence production. They
can come up with the best quality defence equipment through free and open
competition.
The Ministry
of Defence (MoD) should speed up its decision making process and improve
transparency.
Lastly, it may
be worth establishing a national commission to examine the most optimal way to
use offset resources.
Thus there
should be closer US-India defence trade and also private companies should be
encouraged to manufacture defence equipments. This will help in improving India ’s
own indigenous capabilities and ultimately its national security.
No comments:
Post a Comment