Absence of a
Brahmin leader makes Modi the best choice
The mutinous Lal Krishna Advani has
retreated, leaving Narendra Modi’s supporters to rejoice and glory in their
victory. In other words, the conqueror in the Advani-Modi battle is not either
of them but the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the BJP’s real ‘high command’. The
episode left Mr. Advani, once beloved of the Sangh, a bitter man, and in his
resignation letter he lashed out at the supra body for not leaving the BJP
alone.
Mr. Modi’s popularity with the party
cadre may have earned him the role of campaign committee chief but it is to the
RSS that he will remain beholden for getting there. The next step, or getting
the nomination to run for Prime Minister, will be more difficult for two
reasons. The RSS has promised Mr. Advani a say in the decision. Secondly, the
BJP’s allies will be more watchful than ever, knowing that what possibly awaits
them is an RSS-Modi combination.
BJP is a political arm of RSS, used in
its multi decade programme of creating a nation based on their idea of Hindu
civilisation. Guru Golwalkar's "We or Our Nationhood Defined" is the Holy
Book of RSS and BJP. In “We or Our
Nation defined (1938)”, he stated: "The non-Hindu people of Hindustan must
either adopt Hindu culture and language, must learn and respect and hold in
reverence the Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but of those of
glorification of the Hindu race and culture ... In a word they may stay in the
country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving
no privileges, far less any preferential treatment—not even citizens'
rights".
The main problem here is Modi is hated
by many Hindus themselves. Why? Maybe
because he is not a Brahmin. But in absence of a Brahmin leader, Modi is the
best choice. After several decades, people are placing hope on a single person
to bring real development to the country. Why are many Hindus so seriously
against this person?
Modi is loved and venerated because he
has assumed the role of psychological defender of religion and culture - educated and
well placed people too find a spiritual reason to recognise him - he is
succeeding in impressing the intellectuals too. He has turned out to be today's
mythological hero that Indians love to have every decade at least!
RSS is a Hindu organization and its
political wing is BJP - what is wrong with that? The BJP is not a religious
party like the Muslim league - but it is Hindu majority party - there is
nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is not to question the credentials of a
party openly labelled "Muslim League". Why do you allow an openly
religious party like the Muslim League to function?
So what if in BJP, the ideological
conclusion is left to the Sangh which rose with "cultural
nationalistic" ambitions? Isn't Congress, which proudly boasts itself to be
the oldest democratic party, revolving around the "High Command"
which mostly have no ideology on which its decisions are based?
What's wrong in BJP having RSS as the
Head? Every political party, in fact a person is based on an ideology. Yes,
some aspects of the RSS might be communal. But it is better than a Party like
Congress whose ideology is not clearly known.
No comments:
Post a Comment